By Lauchlan Mackinnon, August 29th 2019.

A Bit of Background …

In my last post, Rethinking Ikigai: How To Find Work You Love And Make A Difference, I took a deep dive into examining a common vocational planning tool – the Ikigai diagram.

I pointed out that the Ikigai model was created by taking a previously existing vocational planning model, and simply changing the name of the outcome – the ideal career or business niche you are seeking – to “Ikigai.”

In this post, I want to take up one more problem with the Ikigai model (and with common vocational planning models in general) and solve it.

The outstanding problem is this:

The Ikigai diagram – or its equivalents – look nice, but they aren’t very clear about what you need to do in practice.

They don’t show you the way.

They don’t neatly translate into a step by step framework for finding your vocation – your ideal career or ideal business niche you are looking for.

But the Vocation Diagram – my alternative to the Ikigai diagram – does.

It provides an easy-to-follow process.

That’s what this post will give you.

First, we’ll recap the Ikigai diagram and the alternative model I developed – the Vocation Diagram.

Then, I’ll show you how the Vocation diagram leads directly to a step by step process for finding your vocation – what to do in practice.

The Ikigai Diagram

You have likely seen the Ikigai diagram before.

If you haven’t, here it is:

Ikigai Diagram

(Source: Toronto Star)

The Ikigai diagram was created by Marc Winn in 2014, by taking the Purpose diagram (below) and replacing the word “Purpose” with “Ikigai.”

I have three issues with the Ikigai diagram.

First, Ikigai is a Japanese word, that is about life in general, not work. It means something like a cross between the French concepts of raison d’etre and joi de vivre. It is not a vocation.

The Japanese word similar to the western concept of finding purpose at work is a different word – Yarigai.

Second, the centre of a Venn diagram, is by definition, what’s at the intersection of all of the circles. You can call what’s at the centre of the diagram a Taco, a Frog, a Unicorn, or an Invoice, but it still is what it is – it is defined by what’s at the intersection of the circles.

So, changing the name of the centre of the Venn diagram from Purpose to Ikigai makes no difference at all to the logic of the model. The intersection of the circles still is what it is, and in this case the “what it is” is a vocation – an ideal career or ideal business niche.

The central intersection is not Ikigai, because as we noted, Ikigai is not a vocational concept – Ikigai is a broader concept about life.

Third, on its own merits, the Purpose model – whether we call the the central intersection Purpose, Ikigai, or Vocation – is not ideal.

For example “Passion” isn’t really at the intersection of “That which you love” and “That which you are good at.” Passion is really just another aspect of “That which you love.”

Similarly, “Vocation” is shown as the intersection of “That which the world needs” and “That which you can be paid for.” But if you don’t love it and you aren’t any good at it, then it’s not a great vocation! Vocation properly belongs at the centre of the diagram and Ikigai – if we include it in the diagram – fits in as another aspect of “That which you love.”

For these reasons and more, I created an alternative to the Ikigai diagram – the Vocation Model.

The Vocation Model

A vocation used to mean, in the Catholic Church, a calling to serve God and do God’s work.

During the Reformation, Martin Luther expanded this to say that anyone, doing their work in whatever station of life (with a few exceptions that were unacceptable to the Church, such as prostitutes) were doing God’s work.

John Calvin expanded this reformation of the concept of vocation further, to say that anyone using their unique individual gifts to do meaningful work or other activities was fulfilling God’s plan for them and living their vocation.

In 1909, Frank Parson’s introduced the concept of vocational planning, with the premise that people should assess their gifts and match their talents to work opportunities.

Vocational Guidance – career and business planning and reinvention – then developed as a field over the course of the 20th and 21st centuries.

The upshot is that a vocation lies at the intersection of a calling, your livelihood, and your unique gifts and strengths:

Vocation - where your calling meets a livelihood

The Vocation Model builds on this conception of a vocation.

The model is shown below:

Vocation Model - full version - Lauchlan Mackinnon - August 2019

The four circles in the Vocation Model Venn diagram are:

  • What you are good at
  • What you love
  • What makes a difference in the world
  • What you can be paid for

With the exception of “What makes a difference in the world,” these circles are just the same as in the Purpose and Ikigai diagrams.

I changed “What the world needs” to “What makes a difference in the world” because the original formulation of “what the world needs” was ambiguous.

“What the world needs” could mean, for example:

  1. What people need in terms of what they want to buy
  2. What the times call for – the zeitgeist (for example, the modern times might call for addressing climate change and saving the planet, and refreshing our political governance models, as well as creating opportunities around technology innovations such as biotechnology and automation)
  3. What makes a difference and impact in the world.

The first of these is covered off already by “What you can be paid for.”

The second makes some sense to the extent that it relates to business opportunities – Steve Jobs for example made his fortune by riding the waves of computer technology, digital animation , and consumer electronic devices – but if it is a real business opportunity, this one also fits into “What you can be paid for.” If it doesn’t fit into “What you can be paid for,” it fits into “What makes a difference in the world.”

So, I changed the name of that circle to “What makes a difference in the world.”

Also, I should clarify: the “What you can be paid for” circle should not be understood as being limited only to commercial opportunities, such as careers or businesses.

It could also be understood in the context of philanthropic or not-for-profit activities.

In these contexts, “What you can be paid for” means either “what you can be funded for” or “what you are prepared to pay for.”

The intersection between any two adjacent circles in the diagram defines something that is worth knowing and developing, namely (respectively):

  • The Contributions you are capable of making
  • How you can be of Service to make a difference in the world
  • The Value you can create and deliver
  • How to Align making a difference with getting paid.

Each of these makes sense as describing the intersection of the two circles.

Your Contribution, for example, is what you love doing and what you are good (or great) at. That’s where you can be self-actualised and make your biggest and greatest contributions.

The Value you can contribute is at the intersection of what you are good at and what you can be paid at.

Your larger Service to the planet and society is at the intersection of what you love and what makes a difference in the world.

And by finding what makes a difference in the world and what you can still be paid for, you find Alignment between making a difference and getting paid.

The next level of the diagram is the inner intersections:

  • Potential
  • Mission
  • Impact
  • Excellence

Your Potential lies at the intersection of your contribution and your service. Alternatively, and meaning exactly the same thing, your Potential is found at the intersection of What you are good at, What you love, and What makes a difference in the world.

It is a higher level concept than your Contribution or Your Service. It is what you are capable of, the difference you are capable of making.

And if you combine your Potential to make a difference with a way to get paid for it (What you can be paid for), you have a Vocation.

Your Excellence is at the intersection of Contribution and Value (or, alternatively, What you can be paid for, What you are good at, and What you love).

Your Excellence is your zone of mastery – it’s where you can reach your greatness, both in terms of expression of your talent and in terms of adding value commercially for other people. It’s work you do well, and love doing.

But if your Excellence was applied to doing something of no social value, or negative social value – something you didn’t believe in or something against your values – it wouldn’t be a vocation. If we now add in “What makes a difference in the world” – reflecting your values and beliefs about what’s important and what matters – now you have a Vocation.

Your Impact is at the intersection of your commercial Value and Your Alignment to making a difference in the world (or, equivalently, at the intersection of What you are good at, What you can be paid for, and What makes a difference in the world).

If you are delivering commercial value you are delivering value and making a difference for someone.

If you align this with making a bigger difference in the world and doing something that is meaningful and matters in a wider sense, you are creating social impact as well as commercial value. The union of this commercial impact with making a difference in the world is what I am calling your Impact.

But you can have impact – be great at something, add commercial value and get paid for it, and make a difference in the world – without loving what you are doing. If you hate that work, it’s not your vocation. So, to find your Vocation, combine your Impact with the What you love circle.

Your Mission is at the intersection of your Service and your Alignment. It represents the intersection of what you can be paid for (your commercial value), What makes a difference (reflecting your wider contribution and elements of your mission and purpose), and What you love (reflecting what you would like to see grown and developed, in your work and in the world).

Recall that the “What you can be paid for” circle is also understood to mean “what you can be funded for” (for a non-profit) or “what you are willing to pay for” (for a philanthropy).

So the Mission is really about where you want to make a difference, that is aligned with a viable business model for doing it. So, if you combine a Mission with your strengths and capabilities – “What you are good at” – you have a Vocation.

At the intersection of any of the following:

  • The four circles in the diagram (What you love, What you are good at, What you can be paid for, and What makes a difference in the world)
  • The four outer intersections in the diagram (Contribution, Service, Alignment, Value)
  • The four inner circles in the diagram (Potential, Vision, Impact, and Excellence)

you find your Vocation.

So that brings us up to speed with what we covered in the Rethinking Ikigai article.

The question now is: How to use the Vocation Model in practice, to find a vocation?

How To Use The Vocation Model As Part Of A Vocational Planning Process

There is no one “right” way to use the model

There is no one “right” way to use the Vocation Model.

It depends on what you want to achieve.

  • If you have a market-driven  opportunity, you might start with “What you can be paid for.”
  • If you are wanting to find a career or start a business you love, you might start with “What you love” or “What you are great at.”
  • If you are starting a business that succeeds, you might start with “What you are good at.”

Also, people’s working styles are different.

Some people like to work through things sequentially.

Others like to be a bit more intuitive, and jump around to work on the bits they need to work on in the order that makes sense to them.

Since some people do like to follow a structured process though, I am recommending a standard pathway through the model, that gives a step-by-step process to follow.

There is a recommended step-by-step pathway

If you want to follow a step-by-stop process for using the Vocation Model, here it is.

The approach is to:

  • Work your way in, from the outside to the inside
  • Follow an appropriate order at each level.

1. Work on the four circles:

This approach starts with the four circles, in a specific order:

Vocation Model - pathway - circles

  1. What you are good at
  2. What you love
  3. What makes a difference in the world
  4. What you can be paid for

You can (of course) do the steps in any other order, if that suits you better.

2. Work on the  outer intersections

The next step is to work on the outer intersections:

VVocation Model - pathway - outer intersections

The suggested standard order for this is:

  1. Contribution
  2. Service
  3. Value
  4. Alignment

Again, of course, you can do this in whichever order makes most sense for you.

3. Work on the inner intersections

The inner intersections are optional. But if you choose to work on them, the next step in the process is now to work on the inner intersections:

Vocation Model - pathway - inner intersections

The suggested order for working through the inner intersections is:

  1. Your Potential
  2. Your Mission
  3. Your Excellence
  4. Your Impact

4. Bring it all together to find your vocation

The previous steps have given you some great ideas about where and how you can best contribute and make a difference – and still get paid for it.

The next step is to bring it all together to find your vocation.

Vocation Model - pathway - centre

This step is as much an art as a science.

Something may leap out to you as the obvious answer.

At other times, it s helpful to brainstorm multiple different scenarios, and either pick one or combine elements from them.

Then, the next step in vocational planning is to test it out – you move from vocational planning to business or career startup.

The steps of the process, summarised:

All these steps of the standard pathway through using the Vocation Model are shown below.

Vocation Model - pathway - all steps

Going Forward …

The world needs the best people getting paid to do their best work – because people living their potential and making their difference is what drives the world forward.

And they need the best tools available to them to make that happen.

I believe the Vocation Model is more practical and actionable than alternative vocational planning models such as the Ikigai model.

The Vocation Model can be turned into a system or process that can be used in workshops, coaching programs, or individual self-study courses to help people find their vocation – a career or business niche that they love.

But how useful it is is not up to me to say – it’s up to you.

Try it out!

And if you do, let me know how it goes – did you find it useful? Can it be improved? Let me know.

About Me

I am passionate about activating human potential – helping make the world a better place.

I do what I can to improve the thinking and tools we have available in our industry and in the world.

I work with smart, creative leaders – transformation leaders such as coaches and consultants, thought leaders such as speakers and authors, and change agents and difference-makers –  to help them make a bigger difference through their work.

I help these leaders sharpen their ideas and messages to cut through and be heard.

And I work with strategy so that have clarity, the right plan, and the right action steps to get to where they want to get to.

You can learn more about me from my home page www.lauchlanmackinnon.com 

Connect For Updates

Like this article? Would you like to get updates about new articles and subscriber-only content?

Subscribe for regular updates from me at newideasandinsights.com. You can opt out at any time.

You can find me on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauchlanmackinnon/

 

If you are in business for yourself, you do marketing – in some form or another.

So do your competitors.

But what gives you a competitive advantage in your marketing?

One answer is provided by Gabriel Weinberg and Justin Mares, in their book Traction: How Any Startup Can Achieve Explosive Customer Growth.

Weinberg is the founder of DuckDuckGo, a multibillion dollar privacy consultancy and the creator of the DuckDuckGo browser. So he has a track record on starting a business and getting traction.

Weinberg and Mares teach a way to think differently about your marketing to grow your business faster and gain a competitive advantage.

The crux of the approach is to think carefully about your marketing channels and find and focus on the ones that work best for you.

The book was originally written for startups, but the ideas apply for any business.

The Short Version

To grow your business and get “traction” in your marketing, apply the Bullseye model:

  1. Identify all the possible marketing channels that you could use
  2. Test the most promising marketing channels
  3. Optimise and scale the marketing channels that worked best

Traction - Bullseye Model

Weinberg and Mares identified 19 effective marketing channels that startups use – and you can use too.  They are listed below.

A Deeper Look …

How exactly does the Bullseye model work?

Can the bullseye model be extended and improved?

And what are the 19 marketing channels used by startups?

Read on to find out.

What Are The 19 Marketing Channels?

The 19 marketing channels used by startups, identified by Weinberg and Mares, are:

  1. Targeting blogs
  2. Conventional PR
  3. Unconventional PR
  4. Search Engine Marketing (SEM)
  5. Social and Display Ads
  6. Offline Ads
  7. Search Engine Optimization (SEO)
  8. Content Marketing
  9. Email Marketing
  10. Viral Marketing
  11. Engineering as Marketing
  12. Business Development (BD)
  13. Sales
  14. Affiliate Programs
  15. Existing Platforms
  16. Trade Shows
  17. Offline Events
  18. Speaking Engagements
  19. Community Building

Many of these are obvious from the title, but some require a little elaboration. Here we go:

Targeting blogs is contributing on other people’s blog through guest posts, articles, sponsorship, and so on.

Conventional PR is distinguished from Unconventional PR in that the first is the usual things like radio and TV interviews, editorial content, and so on, while the latter is activities like publicity stunts or developing a tribe of superfans.

Search Engine Marketing (SEM) is Google search ads.

Social and Display Ads is essentially all other forms of Pay-Per-Click (PPC) advertising such as FB, LI, Twitter, and YouTube, advertising; Google display ads; and other ad display networks.

Offline Ads is advertising through channels such as radio, TV, billboard, and direct mail.

SEO is developing unpaid traffic from search engines to a blog or website.

Viral marketing includes word-of-mouth referrals. Its ideal objective is to raise your average referral per client or customer to greater than one, so that you achieve “virality.”

Engineering as Marketing is developing a mini-product or training that attracts people and generates and qualifies leads. This could be, for example, a quiz that tells them which type of business they have or which stage of business they are at, a 5 day challenge or 5-part home study course.

Business Development (BD) – is “the process of creating strategic relationships that benefit both your startup and your partner” In the internet marketing, coaching, or transformational leadership worlds, this is what we would call Joint Venture (JV) partnerships.

Sales means direct sales outreach – reaching out to key people in key target companies. and commencing a conversation that progresses down a sales pipeline.

Existing Platforms is “focusing your growth efforts on a megaplatform like Facebook, Twitter, or the App Store, and getting some of their hundreds of millions of users to use your product” YouTube, Amazon, and podcasting can all fall into this category. The book particularly emphasises a strategy of getting in early on new platforms, and riding a platform as it grows.

Offline Events is live events, like conferences, workshops, or meetups.

Community Building is building communities of people who interact with each other around your product, or around a topic of relevance for your business. This could be done for example on Facebook groups.

Where Did The Idea Come From, Anyway?

Weinberg and Mares were interested in startups.

Which startups succeed?

Which ones don’t?

What makes the difference?

Weinberg and Mares found that product development is well understood by startups, with tools like market research interviews and “minimum viable products”:

“If you’re starting a company, chances are you can build a product. Almost every failed startup has a product. What failed startups don’t have is enough customers.”

Those startups who delayed finding and developing marketing channels until after the product was developed struggled to get traction –  real customer growth.

So, Weinberg and Mares zeroed in on marketing channels.

In addition to leaving developing marketing channels until it’s too late, they identified two common issues:

“First, most founders consider using only traction channels with which they’re already familiar, or those they think they should be using because of their type of product or company. This means that far too many startups focus on the same channels and ignore other promising ways to get traction. In fact, often the most underutilized channels in an industry are the most promising ones.

Second, it’s hard to predict the traction channel that will work best. You can make educated guesses, but until you start running tests, it’s difficult to tell which channel is the best one for you right now.”

Their research found that there are 19 specific marketing channels that startups used:

“After interviewing more than forty successful founders and researching countless more, we discovered that startups get traction through nineteen different channels. Many successful startups experimented with multiple channels until they found one that worked. We call these customer acquisition channels “traction channels.” These are marketing and distribution channels through which your startup can get traction: real customer growth.”

Successful startups experimented with different marketing channels.

Of course, marketing channels aren’t the whole story – market research and product development both matter. Weinberg and Mares suggest that marketing channels and product development should each be 50% of the story for startups.

The Bullseye Model – What You Need To Know

The challenge for startups – or any business – is to find which marketing channels will work best for you.

If you are in a competitive market environment, it is even more important to find a mix of marketing channels that allows you to tap into your market in a way that competitors do not.

Weinberg and Mares proposed a model for this: the Bullseye model.

“With nineteen traction channels to consider, figuring out which one to focus on is tough. That’s why we’ve created a simple framework called Bullseye that will help you find the channel that will get you traction.”

The Bullseye model consists of three stages:

  1. Identify all the possible marketing channels that you could use
  2. Test the most promising marketing channels
  3. Optimise and scale the marketing channels that worked best

The Bullseye is shown below.

Traction - Bullseye Model

Let’s look at each of these stages in turn.

1. The Outer Ring: What’s Possible

“The first step in Bullseye is brainstorming every single traction channel. If you were to advertise offline, where would be the best place to do it? If you were to give a speech, who would be the ideal audience? Imagine what success would look like in each channel, and write it down in your outer ring.”

2. The Middle Ring: What’s Probable

“The second step in Bullseye is running cheap traction tests in the channels that seem most promising.
Go around your outer ring and promote your best traction channel ideas to your middle ring.”

Now you bring your ideas for the best marketing channels down to say three or four channels.

There are two rules for testing out a channel in the “middle ring”:

  1. Test one marketing channel at a time
  2. Don’t spend too many resources on it – it should be cheap and quick

For initial testing they suggest spend less than $1,000, and do it in less than a month:

“These first channel strategy tests are often very cheap and short. For instance, if you spend just $250 on AdWords, you’ll get a rough idea of how well the search engine marketing channel works for your business … you shouldn’t be spending more than a thousand dollars and a month’s time on a middle ring test, and often significantly less.”

When you see something is working, you can invest more and scale it out.

3. The Inner Ring: What’s Working

“The third and final step in Bullseye is to focus solely on the channel that will move the needle for your startup: your core channel.
If all went well, one of the traction channels you tested in your middle ring produced promising results. In that case, you should start directing all your traction efforts and resources toward this most promising channel. You hit the Bullseye! You’ve found your core channel.”

Put It To Work For Your Business

There’s a good chance that the 80/20 rule will apply … if you try 5 strategies in your Middle Ring, one may be much better than the others.

Be creative.

And be original.

If you can add something else to your marketing mix that works great, and your competitors haven’t thought of yet, you’ve just given yourself a big advantage.

Nothing will work until you apply it. Put aside a couple of hours, brainstorm your “Outer Ring” in the Bullseye model, and schedule trying out one or more of the channels you identified.

Applying the Bullseye Model in more depth …

There is more we can do to make the Bullseye model work for us. I explore this in Growing Your Business With The Bullseye Model.

About Me

I am passionate about activating human potential – helping make the world a better place.

I work with smart, creative leaders – transformation leaders such as coaches and consultants, thought leaders such as speakers and authors, and change agents and difference-makers –  to help them make a bigger difference through their work.

I focus on the areas of strategy, alignment, and full-expression – turning your ideas and expertise into messages that cut through and programs, services or products that make a difference.

I do what I can to improve the thinking and tools we have available in our industry and in the world.

You can learn more about me from my home page www.lauchlanmackinnon.com 

Connect For Updates

Like this article? Would you like to get updates about new articles and subscriber-only content?

Subscribe for regular updates from me at newideasandinsights.com. You can opt out at any time.

You can find me on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauchlanmackinnon/

 

There’s a very popular model for finding work you love.

It’s doing the rounds now.

It’s the Ikigai Venn diagram:

Ikigai, the model tells us, is our “reason for being” – and if we find what is at the intersection of these four circles, we will know our Ikigai.

This is very helpful and motivational for people going through career reinvention, or who want to find their niche in business.

But to use it effectively, it helps to understand some more about it.

Where did the Ikigai diagram come from?
What is the Japanese concept of Ikigai anyway?
Is Ikigai the best model to use to find my purpose or vocation?

Let’s find out …